Justice, Ethics and Law - critical evaluation of one of the three Essay

Justice, Ethics and Law - critical evaluation of adept of the three topics below - Essay ExampleThey insist that the idea of all people possessing certain rights by virtue of their clementity, even in the absence of legislation, is baseless and only loose talk.2The ambiguity regarding the credibility of human rights dates back to the 18th century shortly after US Declaration of Independence in 1776, and bakers dozen years ahead, the French declaration of the rights of man. The US Declaration stated that every man is empower by their Creator with certain inalienable rights while the French Declaration asserted men argon born and remain free and equal in rights. Not long afterwards, Jeremy Bentham, in his writings amidst 1791 and 1792,3 differed with the concept of human rights and called for its dismissal. Bentham claimed that the idea of human rights was borrowed from the Americans and was not practical. Even today, there is still widespread racket on issues relating to human r ights. Most critics maintain that human rights lack coherence, cogency and legitimacy while few still point out grey areas such as social and economic rights.4Amartya Sen5 proposes several guidelines for the elements of a human rights theory that adequately address the issue of legitimacy of human rights. I will rate these six guidelines as conclusions to arguments which he bases on one or more premises explained under apiece subheading. The paper will analyse each of these conclusions and their supporting premises and critically assess their legitimacy and whatsoever alternative suggestions.Sen claims that human rights are primarily estimable demands rather than legal commands.6 He makes this conclusion base on two premises. First, even though human rights have often resulted in legislation, it is considered a win fact, as opposed to a characteristic of human rights. Second, Sen states that human rights are agreements on certain ethical affirmations and the