John dewey v rudolf steiner

A comp are on 2 theorists canful Dewey Rudolf Steiner thither are many theories and philosophies that fall in make and g bingle some which are heretofore widely used today. Each homosexual being has a headway of their admit and it is because of some separates that we are able to translate progress and t each(prenominal) in so many unalike ways. Comparing divergent methods, commandments, theories and ideas allows our perspicacity to reason and understand to a greater extent than Just our own point of apparent horizon. In child nurture there Is so much to learn, each child is funny and because of this uniqueness we an non only capture one pattern of didactics for every(prenominal) child.Every child needs to have the luck to succeed and progress to the best of their individualistized king. I would like to compare two very intellectual and pro set individuals who have expanded the minds of many people. tail Dewey, a conceptualizer In Pragmatism and progressivi sm. HIS view was that you would develop and learn by employ the mind to think and to physically do. To launch and enter society come up equipped, mentally and physically. I see the aim of nurture as the organic evolution f the unmarried to function as discover of a society and to contri merelye to the on dismission formation of that society toilette Dewey was innate(p) In Vermont USA In 1859.He was mainly cognize to people rough his views and philosophies on the educational system. He only shared his views about many other topics such as ethics, social theories, metaphysics and more than. At the end of the ordinal century in the United States of the States a new philosophical causal be onnt started which they called Pragmatism. This was to Join intellectuals who had views, opinions and philosophical theories. The professors who suggested theories needed decent credibility and practicality without this they would be rejected.John Dewey played a big role In this exe cution whilst also publishing his work in books and sharing his theories in many various places including universities. His thoughts on the educational system and childs study genuinelyly began to excel once he founded the University Laboratory School which became the Dewey School. This is where he taught his students to have an active mind, to become educational thinkers. He believed strongly In the butt of growth and high principles of mental activity. exact did he know that his theories would continue to this day.John Dewey did not believe in the rigid regimentation of the educational system which was in place and believed that each individual learner would exceed their own(prenominal) best not by burden but more by example, by experiencing and doing. Perfecting one selfs growth and being part of a system that saw tutor as a social community. John Dewey believed that good education should have a aspire In society and each Individual. John Dewey stresses the Idea that the quality as a member of society. The belief that all received education comes about through follow through does not mean that all experiences are genuinely or equally educative. Rudolf Steiner however did not see warmness to eye with John Dewey on every take aim. They some(prenominal) had a deep passion for the public assistance and development of kind beings yet had different views on how to pip that successful spirit level in emotional state. Rudolf Steiner, of Austrian origin was born in Croatia 1861. Being raised in a natural countryside environment allowed him from the other(a) age of 8 to reason in his mind about the endless possibilities the human mind can have, reaching a level of sacredity from young.He is known today as the Philosopher of Freedom he wanted to educate himself and others more on spirituality and the emancipation in learning and developing. Rudolf Steiner envisioned the spiritual macrocosm as being as real as the physical world we delay in. He devoted his life in search of answers, he started his quest by studying Science and Philosophy in Vienna. After years of study and individualised growth the answers became clear to him that he had found a spiritual path which was to be called Anthropology. He believed that this would lead the spiritual in the human being to the spiritual in the universe. There is nothing more heavy for life, even for material life, than the strong and authorized realization of communion with the spiritual world. Rudolf Steiner was a strong believer in the Natural and Holistic development in a child. Each phase of a childs development needed nurturing, enriching and supporting, therefore, he believed that there should be three inhering takes in a childs development. Each present outliveing about 7 years, he put a make do of violence on the fact that not one stage should be shortened because of a set curricular expectation.He believed if each individual developed at their own footprint gra dually learning every big life skill they would become well educated adults. His method of program line was neer to reach statistical highs but to reach soulfulnessal growth. Each child would be taught and treated as an individual, with different levels and development speeds. The three phases are 0-7 which is seen as the early holding phase, the second phase 7-14 which is the heart of the childhood and last but not least the 14-21 which would be the adolescence phase.Each phase needs specific teaching and Rudolf Steiner made sure that there was a strong harmony in his teaching methods. This would be through artistic expression, saltation (rhythmic), singing, play and many other forms of creativity. His teaching methods were not for the minority, this was a method he believed would be great for all of mankind. The spiritual harmony and togetherness he encouraged within directs would be inefficiency to every child, regardless of pedantic ability, class, ethnicity or religion. We shouldnt ask What does a person need to be able to do in order to fit into the vivacious social order today? sort of we should ask what lives in each human being and what can be developed in him or her? As I said in the beginning, each individual has a mind of their own. The or so well-favored conclusion for me is that philosophers have pushed their mental ability to find and explain questions and doubts a lot of us have but cannot answer. I have found some uprightness and sense in answer but we can strive to expand our knowledge.Both John Dewey and Rudolf Steiner made it their mission in life to educate themselves and educate us. I believe that each person can cite and understand both their theories to an extent, however, we have the freedom of choice. I personally prefer Rudolf Steiner, I attended his schools during all of my primary school years and his method of teaching I would never dispute. The personal, structured learning strategies Rudolf Steiner utilize are i n my opinion the most natural way to educate a young person.