Should juveniles be tried as adults?

President Bush stated When America teaches her

children right from wrong and teaches set that

respect heart in our country, our country will be

better off. This commendation was released after a 15-

year-old boy shot and killed two classmates and

injured 13 at a high school near San Diego,

California. He will be charged as an adult to a lower place

state law.

        

        I firmly believe that in cases of felonies such

as murder or arson committed by juveniles over the

age of reason, those juveniles should be tried as

adults. The capability to know the difference between

right and wrong is defined by as the age of reason.

In some states, they overlook the age of reason and

imply that juveniles under the age of 18 be tried

as adults for serious crimes and serve longer

sentences for the display case of crime committed.

        Some people who oppose trying a juvenile as

an adult may come to the conclusion that young kids

do not realize the finality of death when

committing murder. These people would reason that

since a juvenile does not directly know a person

then he doesnt understand that this person is a

human being. The juvenile may not consider the fact

that the victim may have a family and friends just

like themselves.

        I disagree with this argument because the

juvenile understands that he is taking a life and

taking a life is not only wrong moreover cruel. Not

intemperately punishing this young adult could lead to

more criminal performance and convictions due to the

belief that punishment will be less severe because

they are a juvenile. If the state does not punish

the juvenile as an adult for the first severe

crime, then certainly the next clock time that same

juvenile commits another criminal act, the court

system...

If you want to get a wide essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper